Bir January PDF Download 2018-2025 Form

The nature of your income on which TDS has been deducted will decide the type of ITR to be furnished by you for claiming refund of excess TDS. ITR for FY 2017–18 only can be filed now with a penalty of Rs. 5000/- till 31.12.2018 and Rs. 10,000/- from 01.01.2019 to 31.03.2019. So if your TDS relates to any previous year, then just forget the refund.

From our Help Center article, How do I logout from Quora?:You can logout from Quora by clicking on the Profile menu at the top-right. You should see a Logout link at the bottom of the dropdown menu that appears.On the mobile apps and mobile web, go to the “You” tab, click the “…” icon, and then select the “Logout” option that appears at the bottom of the menu.For more information about Quora’s features and frequently asked questions, check out our Help Center.

For Part II you write in where you reside on Line 9 and on Line 10 the withholding rate from 0 to 30% depending on which article of the US/Trinidad tax treaty applies to you.  Then write in the type of income and the treaty article that applies to your income. The most common are Article 9 for business profits or Article 11 for personal services, but not knowing your particular circumstance I can't say if one of those is correct for you.Part III only requires your signature and the date signed.  You are attesting that the statements in Part III are true.

Hard copies of records that stand as proof to the transaction (eg: Deposit voichers, cheques,...) are retained for a period of 10 years.In case a dispute is raised about the transaction, the records must be maintained for a period of 10 years after the dispute is closed.Other records like account opening forms, account transfer forma,... are maintained for a period of 10 years after the account is closed.The database of the bank ensures that transaction details are available forever.

Years ago I worked at document management company.  There is cool software that can automate aspects of hand-written forms.  We had an airport as a customer - they scanned plenty and (as I said before) this was several years ago...On your airport customs forms, the "boxes" that you 'need' to write on - are basically invisible to the scanner - but are used because then us humans will tend to write neater and clearer which make sit easier to recognize with a computer.  Any characters with less than X% accuracy based on a recognition engine are flagged and shown as an image zoomed into the particular character so a human operator can then say "that is an "A".   This way, you can rapidly go through most forms and output it to say - an SQL database, complete with link to original image of the form you filled in.If you see "black boxes" at three corners of the document - it is likely set up for scanning (they help to identify and orient the page digitally).  If there is a unique barcode on the document somewhere I would theorize there is an even higher likelihood of it being scanned - the document is of enough value to be printed individually which costs more, which means it is likely going to be used on the capture side.   (I've noticed in the past in Bahamas and some other Caribbean islands they use these sorts of capture mechanisms, but they have far fewer people entering than the US does everyday)The real answer is: it depends.  Depending on each country and its policies and procedures.  Generally I would be surprised if they scanned and held onto the paper.   In the US, they proably file those for a set period of time then destroy them, perhaps mining them for some data about travellers. In the end,  I suspect the "paper-to-data capture" likelihood of customs forms ranges somewhere on a spectrum like this:Third world Customs Guy has paper to show he did his job, paper gets thrown out at end of shift. ------>  We keep all the papers! everything is scanned as you pass by customs and unique barcodes identify which flight/gate/area the form was handed out at, so we co-ordinate with cameras in the airport and have captured your image.  We also know exactly how much vodka you brought into the country. :)

I was selected for a summer internship 2016.I tried to be very open while filling the preference form: I choose many products as my favorite products and I said I'm open about the team I want to join.I even was very open in the  location and start date to get host matching interviews (I negotiated the start date in the interview until both me and my host were happy.) You could ask your recruiter to review your form (there are very cool and could help you a lot since they have a bigger experience).Do a search on the potential team.Before the interviews,  try to find smart question that you are going to ask for the potential host (do a search on the team  to find nice and deep questions to impress your host). Prepare well your resume.You are very likely not going to get algorithm/data structure questions like in the first round. It's going to be just some friendly chat if you are lucky. If your potential team is working on something like machine learning, expect that  they are going to ask you questions about machine learning, courses related to machine learning you have and relevant experience (projects, internship). Of course you have to study that before the interview. Take as long time as you need if you feel rusty. It takes some time to get ready for the host matching (it's less than the technical interview)  but it's worth it of course.

I want to believe that most banks nowadays have made the process of opening bank account, which used to be cumbersome, less cumbersome. All you need to do is to approach the bank, collect the form, and fill. However if you have any difficulty in filling it, you can always call on one of the banks rep to help you out.

In Feild of OPENING ACCOUNT fill the type of account you wish to open SAVINGS/CURRENT ACCOUNTIn Feild of DEBIT CARD fill the type of card you wish to use VISA/MASTER CARDIn Feild of AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION fill the amount you wish to add to your account for the balance of your account ,it can be any amount  1000/2000/3000,or any other amount you wish to enter for your first balance .

Why was the Bible composed of the books and scriptures it has? That’s an interesting question. I’ve been trying to figure out a way to answer without putting you to sleep.It’s so easy to forget the Bible was recorded by real flesh and blood, sweating and struggling, weeping and praying, dancing, loving, rejoicing people. People who sought to understand their world, to figure out who the heck God was and what He wants from us—or for us. People who failed, who lied, who were selfish and blind; people who were wise and kind and sometimes even good. People who got mad at God and yelled at him and loved and talked to him and let him down and earned his admiration and cooperation—and anger. People who suffered. People who loved. In real life—messy and unpredictable life—filled with unknowns and regrets and insecurities, and the occasional triumph, these people went through things. They talked to God about it. A few of them journaled about that. Other people read it and said, wow—and kept it. Sort of like my mother’s basement, they collected these writings. They could tell there was something special about them. Eventually they stuck them all in a folder (marked special talks with God) together.That’s pretty much it for the non-technical answer.The technical answer gets a little more complicated, so snoozing here may be inevitable. There is no scholarly consensus about when the Hebrew canon was fixed. (When they went into the basement and said, “Enough already!”) Some think around BC 100—give or take—but there are some problems with this.The divine inspiration of the Law in the five books of the Pentateuch of Moses, was recognized—maybe—as early as II Kings 22:8f (~ BC 848–841), and was again reaffirmed as Scripture during the Restoration (BC 559–530; Ezra 7:6, Nehemiah 8:1, Zechariah 7:12). There is a lot of theory here and not much else because it is so far back in history. (We don’t really know what we are talking about but we talk a lot anyway.)The Prophets which included the Former Prophets that are part of the Historical Books, the Major Prophets, and the Prophets of the Book of the Twelve (the Minor Prophets), were accepted as inspired Scripture by the end of the second century BC (II Maccabees 2:13, 15:9; Sirach Foreword, 49:10).The prophets were always recognized as speaking with God and writing the words of God. It is fascinating—and a comment on human nature—that people recognized this, believed it as a truth enough to save the prophetic writings and call them sacred—but wouldn’t do what they were told by those same guys. ( If you ever want an explanation for why the earth is as screwed up as it is—there is no real need to look further than that one right there.)While the Psalms were uniformly regarded as Scripture, the final books of the Writings—wisdom literature, history, poetry, and songs—took time to be accepted. We always have some we waffle on apparently. We’re down in the basement, looking through that dusty old file and we come across something and say, “What the heck is that doing here? Who put this here?!?” Then we have to get coffee, sit down, blah blah on forever, before deciding it was put there for perfectly good reasons and we can all go home.It is now known because of the Dead Sea Scrolls that the Writings varied from sect to sect.Following the Roman destruction of the Jerusalem Temple in 70 AD, the rabbinical school of the Pharisees moved to Jamnia. It was a tiny little town but it became a center of religious thought. There was a theory that was popular for much of the twentieth century that it was in Jamnia that the Jews finalised their Jewish canon, however, it was increasingly questioned from the 1960s onward, and has been largely discredited. What they did was decide on a couple of books.The Council of Jamnia was a small collection of rabbinic Jewish leaders in the late first century who decided to get together over that metaphorical coffee and discuss the canonical status of Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon and Esther—to determine which of the Writings should be retained for the Hebrew canon. They used four criteria: the book should conform to the Torah; it must have been written before the time of Ezra (circa 450 BC); it must be written in Hebrew; and composed in Judah or Israel.This was only about those last few books though, because there already existed a popular consensus on the books that were thought of as sacred before Jamnia. These books had been known publicly since the time of Ezra.The Hebrew canon for Judaism recognized ten books less than the Canon of the Greek Septuagint.The Masoretic Hebrew Text of Galilee (developed from the eighth through tenth century AD) confirmed the Hebrew canon for Judaism.The 24 Books of Judaism are equivalent to the 39 Books common to all Christian Old Testaments, for Samuel, Kings, Chronicles, and Ezra-Nehemiah were each divided into two parts in the Christian canons, and the one Book of the Twelve Minor Prophets was split into twelve books, one for each prophet. (We like more file folders than they did apparently. Short attention spans.)The discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls of the Essenes, a conservative religious sect that emerged circa 200 BC, has shed new light on Hebrew Scripture. Every book of the Old Testament was found in the Dead Sea Scrolls —except for the Book of Esther! It is important to note that the Dead Sea Scrolls included 3 books written in Hebrew which had been considered part of the Apocrypha - Tobit (or Tobias), Sirach, and the Letter of Jeremiah, as well as Psalm 151 of David. (151?!> 151?!? That totally messes up the symmetry! What was God thinking?!)Among the diverse scrolls, several copies of the Books of Enoch and Jubilees were discovered as well, both of which are also found in the Old Testament of the Oriental Orthodox Church of Ethiopia. (Hah! So there! The Ethiopians knew what they were doing after all!)While the Dead Sea Scrolls raise questions about the traditional canon, they confirm much of our knowledge about Hebrew Scripture. An intact scroll of Isaiah was found, completely identical to our present Book in the Bible. Since it is roughly 1000 years older than any previous manuscript, it demonstrates the dependability of sacred texts.  In summary, modern Christianity reflects the lack of uniformity found in the canon of the Old Testament, for Catholics and Eastern Orthodox continue to refer to the Greek Septuagint as Old Testament while Protestants chose the Masoretic Text of the Hebrew canon.Now. If we are going to cover the New Testament canon as well, I’m going to need another cup of coffee.Take your Nodoze…A Tentative Theory of the origins of the gospelsThe apostolic psignNowers gave the greatest prominence to the passion material, but they also knew it had to be presented within a narrative in order to make sense of who Jesus was to those listening. Peter gave connected accounts in his psignNowing (i.e. Acts 10:39) and this likely became the standard pattern.At the same time, the instruction of new converts was also taking place; the major content of this teaching material was probably the sayings of Jesus, in —most probably— some combination of oral and written form. Certain written tracts were likely produced specifically to help with such instruction. Creeds were memorized. (It’s possible this early teaching was at least a partial product of Matthew writing in Aramaic/Hebrew.)It is known that early facts concerning Jesus were memorized in creedal form. It is likely “servants of the word” were given the traditions by eye-witnesses, that these sayings and teachings of Jesus were also memorized, maintained, and passed on, in the oral tradition that was carefully monitored by the original eye-witnesses. We know Paul went to Jerusalem twice to check the consistency of his teaching with the Apostles. It is likely that was normal.Mark and Peter were together in Rome, most probably more than once, and after Peter’s departure the first time, Mark wrote down Peter’s reminiscences to be used there in the Roman church. This most probably happened earlier than form critics have alleged: at the latest, Peter was martyred during Nero’s persecution between AD 64-67, although it is possible he was killed earlier, not long after Paul was beheaded in the late 50’s A.D. (New Discoveries Relating to the Apostle Paul) These dates, and Papias’ information, along with references by other early church fathers, indicate Mark would most likely have been written in the 50’s.Matthew got a copy of Mark and added some of the teaching material being used for the new converts, his personal reminiscences, possibly his earlier text in Hebrew and Aramaic, along with the ‘sayings’ material preserved in discourses, and these would all have been used by Matthew (perhaps given to a professional scribe) to dovetail into Mark’s framework in the Greek form we have now.There are arguments to be made that Mark and Matthew were written in reverse order—that Matthew came first. If that were the case, Mark is the one who took a copy of Matthew—it having a tradition as having been established as authoritative for the longest period since it was first written in the Hebrew perhaps as early as the 40’s—and, using what he knew of Peter’s reminiscences, took out what he recognized from Peter, thereby creating an abstract of Matthew based on the teachings of Peter. That means the Greek version of Matthew would have been written in the early 50’s and Mark not much later.Luke, who was personally acquainted with Mark, conceived a plan to do his own research—being a doctor and all that and not wanting to just accept what he was told—and to write his own account. He studied all the material he could lay his hands on, including all the oral reports of eye-witnesses and the oral tradition which by this time would have been well fixed in the manner of oral history Luke seems to have had a copy of Mark, he added in some of the teaching material available to him (which preserved shorter discourses of Jesus than those preserved in Matthew), and added some narrative material from some written tracts, and he proceeded to write an account of his own based on what he had learned.Variations of emphasis and content were evidently no barrier to the acceptance of all three gospels early on. The variations would have been regarded as part of the revelatory character of these records.It is therefore possible to affirm the powerful influence these gospels exerted, being seen as authoritative from their origins, at a very early stage in the history of Christianity.Paul’s writings were recognized as sacred immediately. They were being equated with the Old Testament even while he was still alive and since Jesus died in the thirties and Paul died in the fifties, that’s extraordinary.Paul considered Luke’s writings to be authoritative (1 Timothy 5:18; also compare Deuteronomy 25:4 and Luke 10:7). Peter recognized Paul’s (2 Peter 3:15-16).Clement of Rome mentioned at least eight of the New Testament books as early as A.D. 95. Polycarp, a disciple of John the apostle, acknowledged 15 books by A.D. 108. Ignatius of Antioch acknowledged about seven by A.D. 115. Later, Irenaeus mentioned 21 books in A.D. 185. Hippolytus recognized 22 books by A.D. 170-235. (Hebrews, James, 2 Peter, 2 John, and 3 John were the books there was disagreement over.)The first “canon” was the Muratorian Canon, which was compiled in AD 170. The Muratorian Canon included all of the New Testament books except Hebrews, James, and 3 John.Please note the canon was not created by the Council of Nicea in (325). This is a common misconception. There is no record of any discussion of the biblical canon at the council.In AD 363, the Council of Laodicea stated that only the Old Testament (along with one book of the Apocrypha) and 26 books of the New Testament (everything but Revelation) were canonical and to be read in the churches.The Council of Hippo (AD 393) and the Council of Carthage (AD 397) affirmed the same 27 books as authoritative.They used criteria that was similar to the criteria the Jews did:1) Was the author an apostle or have a close enough connection with an apostle to convey an apostle’s thoughts and words?2) Is the book being accepted by the body of Christ at large as consistent with what they have already received from those apostles?3) Did the book contain consistency of doctrine and orthodox teaching? Oral history and apostolic testimony had established immediately after Jesus’ death what “orthodoxy” was, so consistency with that teaching was the measure of what was heresy and what wasn’t, and what was sacred text and what wasn’t.4) Did the book bear evidence of high moral and spiritual values that would reflect a work of the Holy Spirit?Human beings. They went through some earth-shaking, mind-blowing stuff. They talked about it, then they made sure it got written down.Real people having real experiences.That’s what it’s all about.(References used here: Guthrie, NT Intro.; Bauckham, Jesus and the Eye-witnesses; N.T.Wright, Jesus and the Victory of God; Michael F.Bird, How God became Jesus; Gary R. Habermas, The Historical Jesus; E.P.Sanders, The Historical Figure of Jesus)

The bir form 1905 january 2000 pdf download is primarily used for filing and updating taxpayer information with the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) in the Philippines. This form ensures that your records are accurate and up-to-date, which is crucial for compliance and avoiding penalties.

You can easily download the bir form 1905 january 2000 pdf from our website by navigating to the resources section. Simply click on the download link provided, and you'll have access to the form in PDF format, ready for immediate use.

No, there is no fee associated with the bir form 1905 january 2000 pdf download from our site. We provide this resource free of charge to help you meet your tax obligations easily and efficiently.

airSlate SignNow offers robust features for managing documents, including eSigning, templates, and document tracking. You can integrate the bir form 1905 january 2000 pdf download into your workflow, making it simple to collect signatures and store records safely.

Yes, airSlate SignNow supports integrations with various software applications including CRM, file storage, and productivity tools. This flexibility allows you to streamline your processes and easily incorporate the bir form 1905 january 2000 pdf download into your existing workflows.

Using airSlate SignNow for eSigning offers numerous benefits, including improved efficiency, reduced paper usage, and expedited turnaround times. By utilizing our platform, you can quickly get the bir form 1905 january 2000 pdf signed and returned without delays.

Absolutely, airSlate SignNow employs industry-standard security measures to protect your documents, including encryption and secure access. You can confidently use our service for signing important documents such as the bir form 1905 january 2000 pdf download, knowing that your information is safe.